Would You have signed Michael Vick??
+4
Hate Me
Clayton Bigsby
MyfriendscallmeMrParker
lakersandravens
8 posters
Page 3 of 3
Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: Would You have signed Michael Vick??
StoneCold (F.P.C.) wrote:u got the saints in the 3? who's your one and 2? (and dont say Minnesota, theyll get the 4)...i got the Saints gettin a bye for the first weekend
im kinda wafflin on whether the Cowboys will go 11-5 or 10-6, but either way its a wild card
lol i actually do have minnesota at 2...but i think whoever wins that divsion (vikings or packers) will get the number 2....
giants at 1
lakersandravens- BAUCE
- Posts : 344
Join date : 2009-09-27
Re: Would You have signed Michael Vick??
the bears are gonna be a problem tho...week 1 vs green bay not withstanding, dont count the bears out...these 3 teams are gonna whoop eachothers asses all season, and NO plays in a division with only 1 other good team, thats why i think NO squeezes in at 2...the saints and cowboys do play a game later this year, ima be very, very interested in that one
StoneCold (F.P.C.)- I Aint Shit
- Posts : 183
Join date : 2009-09-29
Age : 37
Location : Chicago
Re: Would You have signed Michael Vick??
Before I go and get my Andy Reid on....
NFC playoffs (early version)
1. Saints-weak division will inflate their schedule
2. Giants- Running game is on point, Eli is making Manningham and the fake Steve Smith look great
3.Vikings- great defense, great running game, solid receivers...if brett holds up.
4. San Fran- i don't believe it but they play tough every week.....thats all i have
5. Eagles- a truly unknown at this point, defense failed it's only true test. Offense hasn't had two of its best players in consecutive games. Play a favorable schedule
6. Falcons- too hungry to give commentary. very good team, defense isn't impressive.
NFC playoffs (early version)
1. Saints-weak division will inflate their schedule
2. Giants- Running game is on point, Eli is making Manningham and the fake Steve Smith look great
3.Vikings- great defense, great running game, solid receivers...if brett holds up.
4. San Fran- i don't believe it but they play tough every week.....thats all i have
5. Eagles- a truly unknown at this point, defense failed it's only true test. Offense hasn't had two of its best players in consecutive games. Play a favorable schedule
6. Falcons- too hungry to give commentary. very good team, defense isn't impressive.
Professor Knowledge- Posts : 83
Join date : 2009-09-28
Location : About to say goodbye to Charlotte...
Re: Would You have signed Michael Vick??
@ professor knowledge
i c/s on everything except the 5, and i dont think i need to elaborate lol
i c/s on everything except the 5, and i dont think i need to elaborate lol
StoneCold (F.P.C.)- I Aint Shit
- Posts : 183
Join date : 2009-09-29
Age : 37
Location : Chicago
Re: Would You have signed Michael Vick??
*Fixed* lollakersandravens wrote:StoneCold (F.P.C.) wrote:u got the saints in the 3? who's your one and 2? (and dont say Minnesota, theyll get the 4)...i got the Saints gettin a bye for the first weekend
im kinda wafflin on whether the Cowboys will go 11-5 or 10-6, but either way its a wild card
lol i actually do have minnesota at 2...but i think whoever wins that divsion (Bears,vikings or packers) will get the number 2....
giants at 1
Hate Me- Admin
- Posts : 355
Join date : 2009-09-29
Age : 35
Location : ChiTown
Re: Would You have signed Michael Vick??
@ knowledge and stone cold
i would love to give the saints the #1 spot considering how strong the giants division is but they could lose on any given day with the way they play....falcons are gonna give them at least one loss...carolina gonna upset them once also
i would love to give the saints the #1 spot considering how strong the giants division is but they could lose on any given day with the way they play....falcons are gonna give them at least one loss...carolina gonna upset them once also
lakersandravens- BAUCE
- Posts : 344
Join date : 2009-09-27
Re: Would You have signed Michael Vick??
lolChitown312{FPC} wrote:*Fixed* lollakersandravens wrote:StoneCold (F.P.C.) wrote:u got the saints in the 3? who's your one and 2? (and dont say Minnesota, theyll get the 4)...i got the Saints gettin a bye for the first weekend
im kinda wafflin on whether the Cowboys will go 11-5 or 10-6, but either way its a wild card
lol i actually do have minnesota at 2...but i think whoever wins that divsion (Bears,vikings or packers) will get the number 2....
giants at 1
lakersandravens- BAUCE
- Posts : 344
Join date : 2009-09-27
Re: Would You have signed Michael Vick??
lakersandravens wrote:@ knowledge and stone cold
i would love to give the saints the #1 spot considering how strong the giants division is but they could lose on any given day with the way they play....falcons are gonna give them at least one loss...carolina gonna upset them once also
theyll lose a game to atlanta, but the panthers wont beat em, the panthers are done for...steve smith bout to go postal on the sidelines
i also think the saints will lose the regular season game to the cowboys...not tryin to sound like a homer pick, but if Terrance Newman can play Marques Colston like he did Steve Smith and Michael Jenkins doesnt give up big plays on his side, the Cowboys rushing attack will outweigh new orleans' passing attack
StoneCold (F.P.C.)- I Aint Shit
- Posts : 183
Join date : 2009-09-29
Age : 37
Location : Chicago
Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
» Does Rapper's Street Cred Get Them Signed Over Quality Of Music?
» Who's checking for Michael Moore's new joint this weekend?
» Who's checking for Michael Moore's new joint this weekend?
Page 3 of 3
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|